Fitch Ratings downgraded one and confirmed nine classes of
The rating outlook for two classes has been revised from stable to negative.
RATING ACTIONS
Entity / Debt
Evaluation
Prior
COMM 2012-CEMR4
A-3 12624QAR4
LT
AAAsf
asserted
AAAsf
AM 12624QAT0
LT
A-sf
asserted
A-sf
A-SB 12624QAQ6
LT
AAAsf
asserted
AAAsf
B 12624QBA0
LT
CCCsf
Downgrade
B-sf
C 12624QAC7
LT
csf
asserted
csf
D12624QAE3
LT
fsd
asserted
fsd
E 12624QAG8
LT
fsd
asserted
fsd
F 12624QAJ2
LT
fsd
asserted
fsd
XA 12624QAS2
LT
A-sf
asserted
A-sf
Page
of 2
SEE ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT DETAILS
KEY SCORING FACTORS
High loss expectations: Fitch’s loss expectations are high due to expected losses on the remaining shopping center asset in the pool, the
Fitch’s analysis included a reimbursement scenario assuming that
Fitch’s current ratings incorporate a benchmark loss of 11.20%. The stable outlook on the investment classes reflects the expectation of repayment of the pool’s performing loans maturing this year given their performance and low leverage, while the distressed classes consider the potential for loss of the
Mall of Concern/Largest Contributor to Lose: The largest FLOC and largest contributor to loss is the
The net operating income (NOI) reported by the YE 2021 server was 6% lower than YE 2020 and 33% lower than the show. Collateral occupancy and manager-reported NOI debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) for this OI loan was 79% and 1.44x at YE 2021, compared to 83% and 1.52x at YE 2020, 90% and 1.81x to YE 2019 and 94% and 2.19x on issue.
Not collateral
Fitch’s base case loss expectation of 55% reflects a 15% cap rate on NOI YE 2021 and represents impending performance and rollover issues. The loan interest rate is 4.625%.
Increased credit enhancement (CE) offset by higher realized losses: CE has increased since issuance due to amortization and loan repayments, with 39.1% of the original pool balance repaid. Additionally, 27.3% of the pool was defeated. Since origination, 16 loans have been liquidated, contributing to realized losses of
Since the previous rating action, the
RATING SENSITIVITIES
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to a negative rating action/downgrade:
Downgrades to “AAAsf” rated categories are not likely due to senior positions in the capital structure and the expected imminent repayment of the majority of the pool maturing in the coming months.
Downgrades to “A-sf” category, although unlikely, would occur if overall pool losses increase, with loans failing to repay on their respective due dates and the remaining mall assets suffering outsized losses beyond that. current estimates. The distressed “Csf” and “CCCsf” rating categories would be downgraded as losses became more certain or realized.
Fitch has identified both a baseline scenario and a worse-than-expected negative stagflation scenario, based on the fallout from the
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/improvement:
Factors that could lead to upgrades would include stable to improved asset performance coupled with redemption and/or defeasance. Upgrades from Investment Grade rated categories would occur with significant improvement in CE and/or defeasance. Classes would not be upgraded above “Asf” if there is a probability of interest shortfall.
Upgrades to the “CCCsf” and “Csf” rating categories are not likely to reflect the risks associated with loans that cannot be refinanced at maturity and the uncertainty of losses for the
Best/Worst Case Evaluation Scenario
Global credit ratings of structured finance transactions have a best-case upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in the positive direction) of seven notches over a three-year rating horizon ; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured negatively) of seven notches over three years. The full range of best-case and worst-case credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from “AAAsf” to “Dsf”. Worst case and worst case credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information on the methodology used to determine industry-specific best-case and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579.